DR. CHRISTOPHER MISKOVSKY, M.D.

DALLAS, TX

Research Active
Orthopaedic Surgery - Hand Surgery NPI registered 21+ years 3 publications 1992 – 2010 NPI: 1093710816
RadiographySurgical Procedures, OperativeCurriculumReoperationEquipment DesignFishesHip ProsthesisFemur Head NecrosisAppetitive BehaviorConditioning, ClassicalData Interpretation, StatisticalFemur HeadTreatment FailurePsychologyTeaching Materials

Practice Location

8210 WALNUT HILL LN
DALLAS, TX 75231-4405

Phone: (214) 750-1207

What does CHRISTOPHER MISKOVSKY research?

Dr. Miskovsky studies various treatments for joint conditions, particularly osteonecrosis, which is a painful condition that affects the hip joint. He examines surgical techniques like core decompression, a procedure aimed at relieving pressure in the hip to improve function. Additionally, he has developed a training tool called the fish stick, designed to help students engage with the process of animal conditioning in an educational setting, thus benefiting those interested in biology and psychology education.

Key findings

  • In a study on core decompression for osteonecrosis, only 35% of patients experienced successful outcomes with pain relief over an average follow-up of 4 years.
  • Many patients continued to face pain or needed a total hip replacement within 11 months post-treatment for osteonecrosis.
  • The best cement technique for knee implants, involving multiple holes and surface cleaning, led to significantly less movement of the implant under pressure compared to other methods.

Frequently asked questions

Does Dr. Miskovsky study osteonecrosis?
Yes, he researches treatments for osteonecrosis, specifically evaluating the effectiveness of core decompression.
What treatments has Dr. Miskovsky researched for joint issues?
He has studied core decompression for osteonecrosis and compared various cement techniques for knee implants.
Is Dr. Miskovsky's work relevant to patients with hip pain?
Absolutely, his research provides important insights into treatment options for hip pain caused by osteonecrosis.

Publications in plain English

The fish stick: an easy-to-use classroom training apparatus for fish.

2010

Psychological reports

Miskovsky C, Becker B, Hilker A, Abramson CI

Plain English
The fish stick is a simple training tool designed to help students condition fish in classrooms. Built from affordable materials, it allows fish to learn by pressing a feeding device, responding to lights or vibrations. Students found it easy to train the fish, making the learning process engaging and effective. Who this helps: This benefits students and educators in psychology and biology classes.

PubMed

Core decompression for osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

1996

Clinical orthopaedics and related research

Markel DC, Miskovsky C, Sculco TP, Pellicci PM, Salvati EA

Plain English
This study looked at a treatment called core decompression for patients with osteonecrosis, a condition that damages the hip joint. Out of 54 hips analyzed, only 35% (19 hips) had successful outcomes, with patients experiencing some pain relief and improved hip function over an average follow-up of about 4 years. However, many patients faced complications, and the overall results were not very promising, as most experienced continued pain or needed a total hip replacement within 11 months. Who this helps: This information is useful for patients with hip pain due to osteonecrosis and their doctors, guiding treatment decisions.

PubMed

The cemented unicondylar knee arthroplasty. An in vitro comparison of three cement techniques.

1992

Clinical orthopaedics and related research

Miskovsky C, Whiteside LA, White SE

Plain English
This study looked at three different methods of attaching knee implants to bones to see which one worked best for keeping the implant secure. It found that the technique that involved drilling multiple holes and cleaning the surface before applying the cement (Group A) provided the best results, showing less movement of the implant under pressure compared to the other methods. Specifically, Group A showed significantly less micromotion during testing, while the other approaches were inconsistent and sometimes failed completely. Who this helps: This benefits patients receiving knee implants and the doctors performing the procedures.

PubMed

Frequent Co-Authors

Brittney Becker Alleah Hilker Charles I Abramson D C Markel T P Sculco P M Pellicci E A Salvati L A Whiteside S E White

Physician data sourced from the NPPES NPI Registry . Publication data from PubMed . Plain-English summaries generated by AI. Not medical advice.