Dr. Mantone studies issues related to healthcare management and the impact of regulations on service quality. He examines how state governments are stepping in to improve accountability in hospitals, especially after instances of fraud. His research also looks at health insurance coverage, particularly efforts by states to provide solutions for the uninsured when federal measures have been ineffective. This work is crucial for patients needing reliable care and coverage, as well as for healthcare professionals striving to maintain high ethical standards.
Key findings
The study on the Malcolm Baldrige Quality Award revealed that concerns over past business practices can overshadow the benefits of awards, emphasizing the importance of transparency.
Convictions of hospital executives for fraud in Rhode Island highlighted the urgent need for stricter oversight to protect patient care and institutional integrity.
Research on state initiatives showed that Massachusetts successfully created a nearly universal health care plan, pointing to the effectiveness of local solutions in increasing access to healthcare.
Frequently asked questions
Does Dr. Mantone study healthcare fraud?
Yes, he examines cases of fraud within healthcare institutions and the resulting need for stronger oversight.
What treatments has Dr. Mantone researched?
While he doesn’t focus on specific treatments, his work involves the governance and ethical standards that affect all healthcare services.
Is Dr. Mantone's work relevant to patients without health insurance?
Absolutely, his research discusses state-level solutions to the uninsured issue, which directly impacts access to healthcare for those patients.
Publications in plain English
Baldrige interrupted. Premier and North Mississippi both took home the prestigious quality award, but their victory celebrations were shortlived.
2007
Modern healthcare
Mantone J
Plain English This research looked at the consequences of winning the Malcolm Baldrige Quality Award for two organizations, Premier and North Mississippi. Despite receiving the award, their celebrations were dampened by concerns over past business practices and conflicts of interest, especially regarding Premier. These issues highlight the need for transparency and ethical practices in healthcare organizations to maintain trust and credibility.
Who this helps: This information is relevant for patients and healthcare professionals who rely on quality and ethical standards in care.
States turn up the heat. As self-regulation sputters, state legislatures are leading charge for more accountability in governance of not-for-profit hospitals.
2006
Modern healthcare
Mantone J
Plain English This paper examines how state governments are stepping in to improve oversight of non-profit hospitals, especially in light of recent scandals. For instance, Rhode Island is considering a new law to create a code of ethics for hospital boards in response to concerns that hospital leaders are not being held accountable. This matters because better governance can lead to improved healthcare services and trust in the system.
Who this helps: This benefits patients and their families, as well as healthcare workers who want to ensure ethical practices in hospitals.
Stating the case for coverage. Frustrated with federal efforts to solve the uninsured problem, many states are taking it upon themselves to find solutions.
2006
Modern healthcare
Mantone J
Plain English This study looks at how U.S. states are trying to solve the problem of people without health insurance since federal efforts haven't worked well. Massachusetts created a nearly universal health care plan after several months of planning and gathering input from different community groups. This matters because it shows that states can take action to ensure more people have access to health care.
Who this helps: Patients who need health insurance coverage.
Trade wars. While our annual group purchasing survey shows continued growth, organizations face ongoing battles involving government inquiries, vendor disputes.
Guilty in Rhode Island. Conviction of hospital executives in Roger Williams case strengthens the argument that stronger oversight needed.
2006
Modern healthcare
Mantone J, Zigmond J
Plain English This paper discusses the recent conviction of two former hospital executives from Roger Williams Medical Center in Rhode Island for committing fraud. Their actions have raised concerns about the need for stricter oversight of hospitals to prevent similar incidents. Stronger regulations are important to ensure that hospitals are managed by qualified individuals who uphold the institution's reputation.
Who this helps: This helps patients and their families, as well as healthcare professionals who want to ensure quality care.
Imaging rules changing focus. The CMS' revisions to imaging reimbursements, self-referrals could give hospitals a leg up on their physician competitors in '07.